The Rule of Order: Fraud & Ice Cream

There is a judge who believes he can succeed—unchecked—at making decisions that exceed the authority of the President. He is so sure of himself that he has even started influencing the minds of others who also have an immediate say in the matter.

Look at it this way:

The judge says, “I want ice cream!” A couple of kids nearby hear that and chime in, “I want ice cream too!” Even though the kid—I mean, the judge—obviously doesn’t need what he’s asking for, he wants it. And he believes that his father—the President—will give him whatever he wants.

But wisdom, strength, and willpower—like the spirit of O’Fallon—determine the depth of a leader’s judgment.

Our President has spent his entire life making deals, and he has always been true to his word.

Now, the Father knows that the Judge has already had plenty of ice cream. Being wise, he tells the child, “No.” The child reacts negatively—pouting, pleading, begging, or even fighting. These tactics mirror those used by terrorist groups across the sea, exploiting emotions to get what they want. The neighbor kids, for instance, are a perfect example.

But I digress.

Some fathers don’t respond well to negativity.

Some wouldn’t have said no to begin with, or they would have caved and given the child the ice cream anyway.

Some fathers offer to buy all the kids ice cream—either because they “feel bad” or because they just don’t give a damn and do whatever is easiest.

Some fathers want all the kids to like them, treating life like a popularity contest. Those ones shovel ice cream into all the children’s mouths.

(Thanks, by the way, @RobertKennedyJr, for all you’re doing to stop those kinds of criminals.)

But this father—whom we call President—is not afraid to prosecute his opponent viciously. He will go as far as embarrassing the child in front of all the other kids before handing him ice cream that he obviously doesn’t need or deserve—if we’re being serious.

This Isn’t About Ice Cream. It’s About Money.

The Junior (Judge) wants money to pay for “unnamed” invoices. This request comes after the President issued an executive order explicitly prohibiting exactly this.

So, the Father made a rule.

And the child didn’t give a damn.

The rule was simple:

Every expense must be accounted for.

Have you ever gotten a call from SHAZAM or another fraud detection service?

They see a suspicious charge on your account and call to ask if you made the purchase. If you say, “No, that wasn’t me,” they shut your card off, and you have to wait for a new one. Until then, you have no money—unless you carry cash.

But that’s okay, because you stopped someone from fraudulently using your hard-earned money.

That’s the President’s rule.

For the child to push back against his father is natural. However, it is inconceivable to believe that the child has the authority to say, before the father, “Give me a bunch of money, and I’m not going to tell you exactly what it’s for.”

Now, let me ask you—

Do you think the kid deserves the ice cream?

Do you know exactly where that money is going?

---

The Bigger Picture: What Comes Next?

Maybe there should be a public platform that allows every American to log in and see real-time transactions made by our government—just like we have access to on our own personal bank accounts.

That is our tax money.

We deserve transparency.

We deserve order.

---

---

Credits:

Written by: TheMetaphorical.com
Edited by: Ziggy
Published: 03/05/2025

#GovernmentTransparency #RuleOfLaw #Accountability #PoliticalIntegrity #Leadership